Just a few months ago, the term “Climate Deniers” meant someone who denied that Global Warming was an absolute, unquestionable fact.
If you asked why some areas are colder, or why the movie “The Day After Tomorrow” depicted massive cold fronts, or why Al Gore says that air conditioning is a killer threat while running around town in an air conditioned limo, then you were a knuckle-dragging climate denier.
If you didn’t fall on your face and instantly believe anything the left said about the climate, you were a climate denier.
If you questioned the “hockey-stick” graph, which has been abandoned for a long time by most climatologists, you were a climate denier.
If you wondered why the founder of The Weather Channel says the Global Warming movement is a hoax, you were a climate denier.
If you wondered why the planet has been cooling since 1998, you were a climate denier.
If you wondered why over 31,000 scientists (over 9,000 of them having PhD’s) have signed a petition rejecting global warming, then you were a climate denier.
After the revelation of private emails from the Hadley CRU at East Anglia over a week ago, the term climate deniers now has taken on an entirely new meaning. As you can see from the massive amount of information on the ClimateDepot website, as well as the online, searchable database of the emails and documents (which have been authenticated by officials at the East Anglia University), the whole Global Warming movement has been based on an elaborate fraud. Data was manipulated to create the impression that the world was warming (when it was really cooling for the past 11 years) and it was all the fault of the modern western lifestyle.
The new definition of a “Climate Denier” is one who denies that the ClimateGate fraud is real, or that the emails and documents are real, or, worst of all, says it doesn’t matter and that their plans to reduce the lifestyles of the populace and institute cap and trade and other heavy taxes will continue. One such group is the UN group that was heavily relying on the data from the Hadley CRU, which has now been completely discredited.
There is “virtually no possibility” of a few scientists biasing the advice given to governments by the UN’s top global warming body, its chair said today.
Not only do the leaked emails show that those involved were trying to avoid releasing their data under the Freedom of Information Request in England, but that they were also destroying the raw data.
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
It’s obvious they were trying to create a “consensus” that global warming was an undeniable fact, whether to push a political agenda or gain financially (or both).
The climatologists at the center of the leaked email and document scandal have taken the line that it is all much ado about nothing.
It’s interesting that Phil Jones, one of those at the center of ClimateGate, profited heavily from this fraud. He’s apparently secured over $22 million in grant money.
“So far, the most interesting file I found in the “documents” directory is pdj_grant_since1990.xls which shows that since 1990, Phil Jones has collected a staggering 13.7 million British pounds ($22.6 million) in grants.
As stated before, the only thing man-made about Global Warming is the hoax surrounding it.